Obamanation and a Socialist Duck

Some liberal bias and code phrases but an interesting piece nonetheless in the mainstream news service Reuters today. It’s amazing to me that the Reuters writer throws around the word socialist and engages in a ‘he – said, she – said’ debate on whether this professor or that intellectual thinks the socialist charge aimed at the Obamanation is with or without merit. Yet lo and behold I come across this at the end of the article – ”Obama came to power on a wave of popular support with a strong record as a social liberal in the U.S. Senate. One of his goals is to redistribute some of the country’s wealth, which appeals to those who say they want action to counter a growing gap between the rich and poor.”

Not a socialist, just a redistributist? Give me a break. Here away from liberal media la-la land, remember the simple time adage – if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it must be a duck. Obama is indeed a socialist duck. Read it here –http://www.reuters.com/article/wtMostRead/idUSTRE52L0J820090322


steph said…

you impress me, both with your writing and your intellect, keep it up

Tim Daniel said…

Thankyou for the nice words steph, I’m learning the ropes here (this is my first blog).I’m finding that blogging is an art,not a science. Thanks for reading…..

Post a Comment

Comments that contain cursing, threats, David Plouffe trolls, circular reasoning, incendiary language, or general leftist hate and moonbattery may be deleted by the Left Coast Rebel….

Related Posts with Thumbnails