Obamacare website is a symptom, not the disease

By Dean_L

There's no doubt that the website for Obamacare has been a disaster.  If you ask anyone in the White House they might be more inclined to describe it as merely 'problematic'.  Even accepting that optimistic premise, the issue is merely a sideshow to the real problem.  The problems with Obamacare extend far beyond the website failures and even beyond the lack of sign-ups to the entitlement program.  The real problems are within the legislation itself, and the website issues are a mere symptom of the root problem: government fallibility.  The government despite what progressives would have you believe is very far from a perfect institution and much of what it does results in failure.  That problem, combined with the mindset of the current White House crew, is what ensures that Obamacare will be a disaster, and the website issues are a mere reflection of how the entire program will get snarled up and bogged down.

The 1965 Social Security Act Amendment to establish Medicare and Medicaid (Public Law 89-97, 79 STAT 286) had fewer words than there are pages in Obamacare.  In fact the Social Security Act of 1935 had just under 9000 words.  Obamacare is 2700+ pages. If you take the failings and shortcomings of Medicare and Medicaid and anticipate an order of magnitude increase in the number of problems you're getting to the right ballpark. 

The fact that the Healthcare.gov website was problematic after years of time to be prepared and built is not surprising.  What is surprising disturbing is the government being caught so flat-footed and deceitful in response to it.  A business expecting to roll out a new product does product testing, in technology projects stress testing and user acceptance testing are common practice.  Typically delayed launches result when there are issues so close to the launch.  Not so the government.
For the three weeks of the ObamaCare exchange rollout debacle, the White House has tried to claim that the issues relate to the overwhelming popularity and web traffic at Heathcare.gov. As late as yesterday, Barack Obama himself claimed that “the number of people who’ve visited the site has been overwhelming, which has aggravated some of these underlying problems,” in a speech that mentioned no other causes to the failure. Last night, the Washington Post reported that the Department of Health and Human Services tested the system just before launch with just a few hundred concurrent connections — and experienced the same failures we’ve seen since...
Given the bureaucratic nature and massive size of government it actually isn't that surprising that the Titanic would continue sail with the iceberg of technical failure dead ahead.  But the iceberg of technical failure are not what will sink Obamacare.  They merely reflect the nature of future problems within the law itself.  This 'super-smart' leadership has never shown an inclination to be forward thinking and have the ability to anticipate and prepare for problems.  Look at developments in Egypt, Iran or the BP oil spill.  All fluster, bluster and no contingencies. 
In real terms, the technical problems will be minor compared to the implosion destined to happen when the full mandate takes effect.  The Republicans trying to block the implementation of Obamacare are in effect trying to do Obama a favor (as well as the nation) by stopping this cluster bomb (you thought I was going somewhere else with the metaphor?) before it dropped on America.  They would have saved Obama the embarrassment of his signature legislation being the biggest, most humiliating boondoggle in the history of American governance.  It's almost tempting enough to stand back and watch it happen and then play the "see we told ya so" card.  If it were not for America's national economic well-being, I'd say let it happen.  Oh wait, it looks like the GOP is already on top of that idea.


  1. I agree. The website is peripheral to the product they are presenting: complete government control of access to healthcare. If, after years of preparation, they can't even get you signed up properly, what are the chances that the actual services needed by an expanded pool of recipients and a shrinking pool of providers will be accomplished?

    1. Basic economics tells us more demand plus less supply equals shortage. But not everyone took basic economics in school.

  2. .

    "There's no doubt that the website for Obamacare has been a disaster."

    Yes. As a new website it has failed and will need to be fixed. Sorry to say though, the world did not come to an end. The failure of a website is just that, a failure of the website.

    "The 1965 Social Security Act Amendment to establish Medicare and Medicaid (Public Law 89-97, 79 STAT 286) had fewer words than there are pages in Obamacare. In fact the Social Security Act of 1935 had just under 9000 words."

    Welcome to the new millennium. The complexity of modern life certainly require more words to write laws. Can you also tell US how many words are in the Constitution of USA and compare that number to how many word/pages are needed to implement voter ID laws?


    "The Republicans trying to block the implementation of Obamacare are in effect trying to do Obama a favor ..."

    Thank you for a great belly-laugh.The RepublicanTs trying to do Obama a favor!!! And you reek of utmost sincerity as you type 'trying to do Obama a favor.' Chuckle chuckle chuckle. And your concern too, just so heartfelt ...

    Seriously? TeaBagist RepublicanTs have absolutely sworn their precious honor to do everything and anything to destroy President Obama and to give him no success ever, on anything.

    Oh pal-ese: "If it were not for America's national economic well-being,..." After watching the government shutdown shenanigans as lead by TeaBagist Senators Cruz and Lee, it is clear. Since when have the jihadists of the RepublicanT party cared about USA's national economic well-being?

    Look; take a deep breath. ACA is law in USA and will succeed.

    Maybe you can try to play your 'told-you-so' card, when you find something you have right about; you know, like the GOP being against Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.

    One thing you should have learned by now; "Don't bet against the people of USA or USA government."

    Ema Nymton

    1. The government compels you, under penalty of law, to obtain only government approved insurance, from a site that does not guarantee the security of the personal and confidential information they demand? (D.O.B., SS#, etc) No one in their right mind would willingly do business with a private firm that conducted themselves in that manner. So, we can understand your infatuation with the process, Ema. Enjoy your free condoms!

    2. Ema, I'm going to respond to your comment in the manner you so fondly employ on a regular basis: ridicule. However, I will keep it short so that your Swiss cheese progressivist mind can retain some of it. Your comment is as convoluted, indecipherable and ill-considered as the ACA itself.

      Not so nice, is it Ema? If you want to engage in debate try it without the name-calling. Personally I take no offense because I do not value your opinion, but to slander an entire group of concerned citizens with slurs is akin to bigotry. If you sincerely believe that people who take issue with the ACA are slack-jawed yokels and not one of them has any basis for legitimate concern you are a lost cause. And I don't mean that in a political sense, I mean as a person.

  3. Hi
    I am David William , a member of some Medical coding & Billing community. I had landed on your site “http://www.leftcoastrebel.com/" and found the articles really worth reading. The quality of your content is so good, that it made me request you something. I love to write medical coding and billing articles and would like to contribute something for your site. I can give you an original guest post and if you want, you can suggest me the topic also and I will write accordingly. Not only that, I will give you the total rights to edit the article and modify it as per your needs.

    In response I expect you to give a link back to one of my endorser who helps me to continue my passion and serve individual sites and blogs like yours.

    Please let me know your thoughts. Waiting for your positive.


Commenting here is a privilege, not a right. Comments that contain cursing or insults and those failing to add to the discussion will be summarily deleted.