Davos 2012: Attacking Capitalism

By the Republican Mother

First off, I 'd like to thank Tim for inviting me to be a part of the crew. I struggled for awhile about what my first post should be about, but when I saw this in the good ol' Economic Policy Journal, I knew I found a good place to start. Please let me know if I rock the boat too hard...

If you are not familiar with Davos, it is where the Elite bankster types get together in Switzerland, home of the Bank of International Settlements - the mother of all central banks. This year, they describe the capitalist system as "outdated and crumbling". Those of you who have been paying attention to the tremendous overlap and interlock between government and large corporations should know by now that we do not have real capitalism, but a soft socialism often called crony capitalism. Here is the meat of it from an AFP article:

"We have a general morality gap, we are over-leveraged, we have neglected to invest in the future, we have undermined social coherence, and we are in danger of completely losing the confidence of future generations," said Klaus Schwab, host and founder of the annual World Economic Forum.
"Solving problems in the context of outdated and crumbling models will only dig us deeper into the hole.
"We are in an era of profound change that urgently requires new ways of thinking instead of more business-as-usual," the 73-year-old said, adding that "capitalism in its current form, has no place in the world around us."
Some 1,600 economic and political leaders, including 40 heads of states and governments, will be asked to come up with new ideas as they converge at eastern Switzerland's chic ski station for the 42nd edition of the five-day World Economic Forum which opens Wednesday.

The worry is, what will they attempt to replace it with?

Robert Wenzel gives a listing of some of the dignitaries, whom I refer to as the S.P.E.C.T.R.E. circle that will be there. I've made one my little maps, as a picture is worth a thousand words:
link to interactive map
I made this with the National Names Database, which is a lot of fun to play around with and get informed about who is hanging out with who. Going from the top right corner, you will find these Davos participants in all areas of the government, the largest banks are highly represented, they donate equally to both political parties in the US, which explains a lot. I think most would be surprised at how many Elite liberal types sit on the boards of the huge corporations that conservatives are encouraged to uphold as bastions of capitalism. For anyone interested in a deeper study of why this is so, I highly recommend my Wall Street and the Bolshevik Revolution study where you will discover that Communism is not at all what you thought it was.

An excerpt from that study by Dr. Antony Sutton who researched the transfer of technology from the US to the Soviet Union while he was a scholar at the Hoover Institution:
On the other hand, it may be observed that both the extreme right and the extreme left of the conventional political spectrum are absolutely collectivist. The national socialist (for example, the fascist) and the international socialist (for example, the Communist) both recommend totalitarian politico-economic systems based on naked, unfettered political power and individual coercion. Both systems require monopoly control of society. While monopoly control of industries was once the objective of J. P. Morgan and J. D. Rockefeller, by the late nineteenth century the inner sanctums of Wall Street understood that the most efficient way to gain an unchallenged monopoly was to "go political" and make society go to work for the monopolists — under the name of the public good and the public interest. This strategy was detailed in 1906 by Frederick C. Howe in his Confessions of a Monopolist.
Consequently, one barrier to mature understanding of recent history is the notion that all capitalists are the bitter and unswerving enemies of all Marxists and socialists. This erroneous idea originated with Karl Marx and was undoubtedly useful to his purposes. In fact, the idea is nonsense. There has been a continuing, albeit concealed, alliance between international political capitalists and international revolutionary socialists — to their mutual benefit. This alliance has gone unobserved largely because historians — with a few notable exceptions — have an unconscious Marxian bias and are thus locked into the impossibility of any such alliance existing. The open-minded reader should bear two clues in mind: monopoly capitalists are the bitter enemies of laissez-faire entrepreneurs; and, given the weaknesses of socialist central planning, the totalitarian socialist state is a perfect captive market for monopoly capitalists, if an alliance can be made with the socialist powerbrokers. Suppose — and it is only hypothesis at this point — that American monopoly capitalists were able to reduce a planned socialist Russia to the status of a captive technical colony? Would not this be the logical twentieth-century internationalist extension of the Morgan railroad monopolies and the Rockefeller petroleum trust of the late nineteenth century?
If you are putting the brains back into your ears after reading that, and want to see the documentation that proves every word of the the above quoted passage, please check out my blog where we explore these themes and plow new ground into what's really going on in our country. There is most definitely a goal in all this collectivism, and those who promote it stand to benefit immensely from a command economy. They would have us cheer-lead of political parties and NOT pay attention to central banking and the flow of capital around the world.

Also in the map above, pay special attention to the NGOs aka Non-Government Organizations. These are the strings that connect the puppets to the puppet masters. This is where our laws are written. If you ever wondered how they can come up with one thousand page bills that no one in Congress has even attempted to read, here is your answer. The last serious look given to these groups was the Reece Committee of 1953 where chief counsel Norman Dodd discovered that these organizations, primarily the Ford Foundation (who employed Obama's mother and was headed up by Timothy Geitner's father) and Carnegie Foundation were conspiring to undermine the Constitution according to Rowen Gaither, President of the Ford Foundation at the time:
"We operate here under directives which emanate from the White House...The substance of the directives under which we operate is that we shalluse our grant making power to alter life in the United States such thatwe can comfortably be merged with the Soviet Union."
But like LeVar Burton always used to say on Reading Rainbow, "don't take my word for it". If you are truly concerned about your country and its economy, you must find the root of the problem before you can begin to hope to pull it up. Personalities are distractions, and the real ball game is going on at a much higher level than the media advertises. Davos is a window we mundanes have to who the real players are.

(Ed's note: Like many savvy individuals in the conservative movement, Republican Mother (small 'r') has been slowly waking up to the true dynamics behind the fight for liberty in America (hint: it's far more complicated than Republicans vs. Democrats; conservatives vs. liberals). She blogs at RepublicanMother.com. Welcome to LCR, RM!)


  1. Great first post!

    I'd never hearf of the BIS before, but sounds like they on well on their way to ruining another generation of economies world-wide. I can only assume they actually know they aren't dealing with real capitalism and don't care. Appreciate the head's up!

  2. Welcome aboard! A great contribution to our base of information and I look forward to reading more!

  3. glad you are here as well as at you own blog-


Commenting here is a privilege, not a right. Comments that contain cursing or insults and those failing to add to the discussion will be summarily deleted.