Tea Party Review of Presidential Issues and Priorities 2012

By San Diego's own B-Daddy, Liberator Today

Tea Party types are a diverse lot.

Even among the small group of SLOBs here in San Diego, there has been considerable debate over the relative merits of the presumed and declared candidates. In an attempt to impose some ideological purity -- which is of course doomed to failure -- I offer the following observations.

First and foremost, I would like to remind both the Tea Party and the nation that the biggest threat to our liberty and prosperity is the unchecked growth of government. Our soaring debt is threatening to crush our ability to grow the economy for the next twenty years. Don't believe me? Look no further than Japan, where the lost decade has stretched to two. They have been piling up debt and big public works projects during this time to no avail. The only candidates worth looking at have the political will and demonstrated record to deal with this mess.

This disqualifies Gingrich, based on his crass and self-serving criticism of Paul Ryan. I think Sarah Palin doesn't fare well by this standard either. Her tenure in Alaska is hardly preparation for dealing with the federal budget, as Alaska is the most socialist part of America (except Puerto Rico) due to Alaska's oil revenue.

Closely related to the growth of entitlements is the growth of both government regulation and bureaucracy. Reversing Obamacare before its main provisions kick in is my most important immediate political goal. Which candidate is going to do so? Do you really think this will be Romney, a man who can't even bring himself to disavow his own Massachusetts plan?

Further, any support for the regulatory nightmare of Cap and Trade should be a non-starter for Tea Party members. Even if you believe in AGW, you should not support Cap and Trade, because it is inherently ineffective and prone to fraud. This issue excludes Pawlenty, for his past support, but to his credit he has recanted.

The third leg of this stool is the need to curb the power of government unions. Christie and Daniels stand out for their records in this regard.

Reforming the tax code goes hand-in-hand with reducing the complexity of government. The tax code is just another avenue of regulation of the economy and one especially prone to manipulation by business interests. It is the source of the sea of special interest money in campaigns. I am looking for candidates supporting a flat tax or scrapping the income tax altogether. I like Herman Cain's support of a national sales tax, mostly because it replaces the income tax.

There is also the matter of focus. Foreign policy is important but not overriding, ditto for social issues. Most Tea Party members are decrying Obama's declarations about Israel's borders today, but I submit that this should not be the overriding concern for our movement. In my view, candidates with significantly out-of-the-mainstream views on foreign policy -- even if we agree with them -- should not receive our support. This excludes Ron Paul from my support. His statement that he wouldn't have targeted bin Laden in Pakistan makes him unelectable, in addition to his overall crankiness. However, see Tim Daniel's analysis of foreign policy issues for more of our perspective on this.

One could also take this view on social issues. Santorum, who has been a vocal social conservative, and Gary Johnson -- with whom I agree on drug policy -- should be viewed with great caution. Controversial and distracting social positions take the focus off the budgetary and regulatory issues that need to be our main focus. Gary Johnson's position on marijuana is quickly becoming a sideshow that threatens to derail his candidacy. In the general election, this will open up a line of attack that will peel away enthusiasm of social conservatives for the Republican nominee. Politics is about coalitions, we need to focus on the core of our coalition: reducing the size and scope of government.

So there you go Tea Partiers, your unofficial chief ideologist has spoken, or at least written. I am sure you will give this all the due deference you give to the edicts of Republican establishment.

Good on you.

(Editor's Note: B-Daddy is a great friend of the site , SLOB founding member and a local tea party patriot working hard to turn back the tide of big government socialism. He blogs at The Liberator Today)


  1. Tim,
    Thanks for the cross post and kind words.

  2. Thank you, Brian. It's pretty amazing that we all come from such different walks of life yet are pretty close on the most important issues of the day.

    Hope to see you guys later today...

  3. B-Daddy: Interesting analysis. I would have like to have read your thoughts on Bachmann.

  4. here's an invaluable book that everyone in the Tea Party must read to become conversant in the finer points of the federal budget and what to do about these overspending programs:

    http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=12085 Reducing the Deficit: Spending and Revenue Options

    It is the only way to confront the problem instead of just waving a red cape at a charging bull. This list will help formulate some substantive proposals to coalesce around and move forward.

  5. Nacilbupera, I don't know enough about Bachmann yet, but my initial impression was that there was a little too much focus on social issues.

    Frank, thanks for the link. It certainly shows that the big money is in the mandatory (entitlement) programs, as I have previously pointed out. These are also the hardest to reform because of the perception that they were "paid into" by the beneficiaries.

  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

  7. (sorry had to re-post after some typos showed up)

    B-Daddy: Your word use of 'perception' is perceptive, without being too cute about it.

    NONE of the entitlement programs are set up as insurance products; investment vehicles; trust funds or Magic Fairy Dust receptacle.

    Everyone needs to look at FICA, etc as nothing more or less than flat-out 'higher taxes'...in the case of SS, much higher than they would have been had we not passed the 1983 SS Act that has taken $2.6 trillion more out of our collective pockets than we needed to meet current obligations.

    And it is all GONE now, never to be seen again.

    I have a ton of other resource docs you can take a look at...they are on the right side of a blog I write without shamelessly hawking it here on LCR...Telemachus at www.telemachusleaps.com.

    EVERY official document you need to read to fully understand the depth and breadth of the magnificent problem we face is linked there....read the Green Book from the Ways and Means Committee first if you care about the entitlement programs.

    NO ONE outside of a few geeky staffer and alums of Capitol Hill like me have even even cracked the spine on those annual tomes...and they are chock full of data and truth we all need to come to grips with.


Commenting here is a privilege, not a right. Comments that contain cursing or insults and those failing to add to the discussion will be summarily deleted.