Progressive’s promote their method for balancing the budget; “Soak the Doctors”

By Sam Foster

Today, the NY Times and Slate proposed what they call the “do-nothing plan” to balance the budget. David Leonhardt opines:

A trick question: If Congress takes no action in coming years, what will happen to the budget deficit?

It will shrink — and shrink a lot. This simple fact may offer the best hope for deficit reduction.

It’s important to keep perspective. These guys cheered trillions in stimulus, auto bailouts, union bailouts, cash for clunkers, cash for caulkers, etc, etc, etc… Now that it is all over, it is time to do nothing, which actually means doing a lot of something.

One part is increasing taxes, on everyone, even the poor. This is achieved by letting the Bush tax cuts expire.

But the coup de grace is a massive push to put the debt burden onto doctors. You see, a massive cut in Medicare reimbursement rates to the tune of 30% is scheduled for 2012. This cut is so massive, the merely holding the reimbursement constant at 2011 levels costs $300 billion dollars, let alone instigating the “do-nothing” progressive plan which cuts, not holds the 2011 line, reimbursements 30%.

So the progressive solution? Let’s balance reckless progressive spending on doctors.

Oh how the Lefties love this idea. Good thing the AMA backed health reform.

1 comment:

  1. It won't happen. Reimbursement for Medicare patients is so low, doctors are barely breaking even. With 30% cuts, physicians would be paying for the privilege to see their Medicare patients.


Commenting here is a privilege, not a right. Comments that contain cursing or insults and those failing to add to the discussion will be summarily deleted.