Obama's Birth Certificate a Scam?

By Proof

First of all, I want to apologize for accepting anything this administration ever offered as being honest or true. I don't know what came over me! Now, I don't consider myself a "birther", but either there are some elaborate hoaxes making the rounds, or this certificate is a phony as a three dollar bill.

The Honolulu Advertiser posted these Hawaiian birth certificates last July. Note both the dates and the file number in the upper right hand corner. (Click here for larger image)

Image and video hosting by TinyPic


According to these, the children were born Aug. 5th, 1961 and were file numbers 61 10637 and 61 10638. So, Barack was born one day earlier, his birth was recorded three days earlier than the twins, and his file number was 10641... three numbers higher than theirs? Don't most government agencies record things sequentially?

Image and video hosting by TinyPic


Why can't we take anything from this guy at face value? To me, this just raises more questions about what someone might be trying to hide.

H/T The Lonely Conservative

Cross posted at Proof Positive, related discussion @ Memeorandum.

14 comments:

  1. Hmmm, interesting point, since one would in fact expect numbering to be sequential.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The file date on Obama's is Aug 8, the file date on the twins is Aug. 11. (Box 20)

    that most likely accounts for the lower number on Obama's.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Don't know how it works in the USA, but in here in Australian and the UK (where I was born), the numbers on certificates are allocated in order of when the birth notices are processed by the office of Births, Deaths & Marriages (the issuer of the certificate) rather than the birth date and time.

    Personally, I would think that because the filing numbers are very close to each other, that would more suggest that the Obama certificate is legitimate than false.

    Perhaps it would behoove the Blog author to pull all the birth certificates from Hawaii from August 1961 and see whether the file numbers are always in birth date & time order, or whether its possible that the issuing office processes a 'batch' of them every so often, and they don't follow *exact* birth order (although a January birth would, logically, have a lower number than a December birth of the same year)

    PS, I don't care whether Obama is legally the US's president or not, I'm an Aussie.

    ReplyDelete
  4. In 1961 wouldn't they have listed his race as Negro instead of African?

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think this is a dead issue. Even if he is illegal, it will now never be proven. Best to go after him on his fascist, anti-American views.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Has anybody noticed how well timed the "victory lap" speech that Trump made was? It ended just moments before the pResident's speech began. Of course, there was no conspiracy there between two friends of Soros to make a nagging birth certificate issue go away....or blow up in their faces unexpectedly. Nope....just really nice timing, right?

    ReplyDelete
  7. @Yowie9644: You may not care but don't try to run for President because you aren't eligible. Neither is BHO. If it's proven that he wasn't eligible, then every soldier who followed his orders is guilty of treason and war crimes, as well as supporting a usurper. This is a bigger deal than you, everyone outside this country (including the media and Washington DC) realize.

    ReplyDelete
  8. While I made the last two points, I agree with Sparky. To those unfamiliar with the birther issue, going after BHO on that only seems like we have no real issue to take up. The fact is everything the man has said and done since taking office are pure fodder for his opponents. Let's beat him on real issues then worry about eligibility going forward.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is a distraction! While I do believe it is an issue, I feel there are more important things to focus on.
    We need to focus on getting rid of him!

    ReplyDelete
  10. John, check out what I just posted, 50 things more important than the birther issue...

    ReplyDelete
  11. American girl: Only the file number was higher on Obama's, not lower, as would be expected.

    And all of the "lady protesting too much" on the left, gave me a reason to take a second look at the documents and find more reasons I believe Obama's is a phony.

    ReplyDelete
  12. oh, you're right. i was thinking it was backwards... hmmm.

    it looks like the laid the BC that was in a binder or something, on top of a plain sheet, and stamped it, and then scanned it. looks weird.

    ReplyDelete
  13. What's up with the date in Box 20? And caucasian in Box 14?

    it is weird how they laid like an image over a plain BC paper...

    ReplyDelete

Commenting here is a privilege, not a right. Comments that contain cursing or insults and those failing to add to the discussion will be summarily deleted.