Divided We Fail

By Chris W
The Libertarian Patriot

If you are a supporter of liberty, anti-war and anti-state you may have noticed the growing divide among supporters of former NM Governor Gary Johnson and TX Rep Ron Paul. Both men, Johnson who has announced he is running and Paul who has formed an exploratory committee, want to be the next President of the United States and will run on the platform of shrinking the federal government, increasing personal liberty and ending our foreign policy of international intervention along with getting our military out of the unconstitutional wars we are now involved in.

Sounds great, two candidates who's views are different from what will be the usual slate of big government, anti-liberty, neo-cons running for the highest office in the land. But herein lies the problem; instead of rallying around both men, there is a rift developing among their supporters.

Those who see Dr Paul as the one true libertarian who can turn our republic around question Gov Johnson's libertarian credentials, often calling him a "beltway libertarian", saying that he does not propose cutting Leviathan enough and that his record as a two-term Governor of NM proves this. I've even seen where it has been thrown out there that Johnson is indirectly being supported by the Koch Brothers.

Some Johnson supporters, on the other hand, question whether Ron Paul is electable enough. They point out that while he has name recognition, the ability to raise large amounts of money and a large base of support especially among younger voters, that has not translated into votes. They also claim that the public perception of him being outside of the mainstream, and a pariah within the GOP, greatly hinders his chances of winning the race.

Both side claim that the movement is not big enough to support two candidates with the same libertarian message and all that will be accomplished is that they siphon votes from each other. [In actuality if this is true, we have no chance of winning anyway so wouldn't two voices for liberty on the stump be better than one?] To this end, some supporters of both men even go as far to say that the other should step down and throw his weight behind the other. [And these people call themselves pro-liberty?]

This is exactly what the establishment wants us to do. Whilst we argue among ourselves over who is more deserving of the libertarian mantle for 2012, they get to focus attention on the other dozen or so potential candidates who will talk a good game, promise us the world and do nothing but grow government, continuing us down the path of destruction that we are currently heading.

There is room in this race for both men. I'm not saying that we can't have our favorite, I happen to think Gary Johnson is the better choice but Ron Paul is deserving as well, but we cannot tear down the other in the process. It's us (libertarians) against them (the establishment) and we can't forget that for a minute. We should promote the virtues of both candidates and rally their collective message of pro-liberty, anti state against the forces that are in opposition to it. Only then will we win.

In the words of Rodney King, "Can't we all get along?"


  1. sounds like my reasoning. My interest is not as much about who, but what will be done!

  2. Ron Paul has zero chance. Zero. His loudest supporters are sometimes a little nuts and more than just a tad anti-sematic. Not saying that you are, just I have had some awful experiences with Ron Paul supporters that I have lovingly nicknamed Paulites.

    I know very little about Gary Johnson, but I have liked what little I heard.

    But I am not purely libertarian. I fall somewhere between libertarian and conservative.

  3. I prefer Johnson because of his track record and he doesn't have the baggage that Ron Paul has (the reputation that he has unjustly earned in conservative circles). I'm torn though because having both of these guys in the debate is a good thing.

    Great post!

  4. Conservative Girl

    I'm sorry that you have had a bad experience with Paul supporters, sometimes they can be a little over the top. His supporters aside, he stands firmly behind his principals and has been the staunchest supporter of the Constitution. He has also been alone in waging a battle against the Fed and their destruction of our currency. At the end of the day, it is about the candidate, not his supporters and Ron Paul is an excellent candidate.

    While I think Dr Paul would be a great President, probable the best in the last 100+ years, I think Gary Johnson would do equally as well. Both men are for smaller government and against foreign intervention but Gov Johnson gets my backing because he is more socially liberal. He also has a proven record as a two-term Governor where as a Republican in a 2:1 Democratic state he successfully vetoed 750 spending bills and left with a balanced budget. The one place where I disagree with him in part is is stance on illegal immigration; I believe we need a stronger border presence than he does, until we get thing under control.

    If you go to his website GaryJohnson2012.com you can learn more about him and he stands on all the issues.

    I'd also hope you'd stop by my blog, thelibertarianpatriot.com as I have plenty of content about both men along with other libertarian issues.

  5. John

    That's where I'm at. Just like in baseball where I root for the laundry not the name on the back, it's more about the ideas and remedies, not whose mouth it comes from.

    It's a shame that we see bickering from people who basically agree on the same things.

  6. Reb

    The more voices for liberty that are heard, the better.

    I can't wait to see them on a stage together shredding the big government, politics as usual, neo-con candidates in the debates.

  7. Totally agree, Chris. I can't wait for the debates, having 2 libertarians in the field is a first, I believe. And yes, they will be surrounded by neocons...I'll have to go to Costco and get a BIG container of popcorn for this!

  8. Just a conservative girl; Isn't your attitude what this article was about?
    Why do we have to tear a candidate down just to try and make someones favorite stand above the others?
    Let this video speak for itself...


Commenting here is a privilege, not a right. Comments that contain cursing or insults and those failing to add to the discussion will be summarily deleted.