New PJM Article: Monty Python and Democrat violence

By Sam Foster

Ever wonder if the Democrats are inheritently violent? If government is truly infested with those of the ruling class, is there evidence that we are being treated as a Lord would their peasants?

Well, look no further. I've compiled the news stories and the evidence of all the violence from political candidates this election season. No surprise, it is all coming from Democrats and no surprise it all reads as if it were some Monty Python movie. Please read my PJM article, link to it, like it on facebook, and tweet it.

Every day the Republican wave rolls deeper inland toward the Democrat strongholds once considered safe, and Obama’s “let’s project our foreign campaign receipts onto Republicans” rhetoric is in full retreat. As a result, congressional Democrats are turning to the darkest reaches of absurdity for election strategies. With less than two weeks until the elections it would appear that Monty Python’s peasant repression strategy is emerging as the dominate modus operandi.

Exactly how does the Monty Python peasant repression strategy work? Behold the instructional video that I personally smuggled out of the DNC’s most secret gulag.

Now with proof in hand, we can fully appreciate this method put in action in races across America. Let me invite you to come see the violence inherent in the system.

Shut up!” demanded Maurice Hinchey, Democrat incumbent from NY’s 22nd Congressional District, as his Monty Python training rolled off his lips with textbook accuracy, literally quoting directly from the Holy Grail movie. The part of Dennis the Peasant was being played by William Kemble, a reporter for the Kingston Daily Freeman. Kemble had been pressing Hinchey on one of his investments, which was dubiously receiving federal grant money. Later Hinchey properly repressed the reporter with finger stabs and chokeholds.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer seems to advocate a limited use of the technique, improvising only the strategy’s initial verbal threats as opposed to Hinchey’s holistic adoption. Hoyer had his chance to put Democrat peasant repression to work at his last debate with challenger Charles Lollar. After Lollar eloquently lambasted Hoyer’s loose grip on the nation’s purse strings and during the thunderous applause that followed, Hoyer put peasant repression practice to good use. “I’m coming after you!” Hoyer threatened Lollar — not once, but twice.

Much, much more at PJM!


  1. Last election Democrats were effete white wine drinking limp wristed cowards. Now they're inheritantly violent? Unbelievable rubbish.

  2. Yes, hatyaphrodite. Unbelievable rubbish that you think the dems are benevolent. Name one benevolent thing they've done in the last 4 years, and Obamacare doesn't count as it promotes abortions and death panels and that's NOT benevolent, nor is empowering unions that physically beat opposition, nor empowering a radical enemy that want's to force us to use 5000 strength sunblock, nor entrenching dependency and thus slavery to the government with the entitlement programs.

  3. this is pure bullshit. how can you say such things when a rand paul supporter just stomped a 23-year-old woman's head into the concrete? "finger stabs" and "threats" are one thing, actual physical violence (and let's not forget the npr bomb threat surely spurred by fox news' extensive and "riveting" coverage of juan williams' firing) are another.

  4. @ Kelly - Thank you for the masterful liberl paradox. It ties in so nicely with my article. I will now detail your foolishness.

    A) It would be helpful if you had actually read my article. Actual physical violence as in say...choking a reporter by an actual congressman in congress (Maurice Hinchey)?

    B) Try looking at the date of my article! It was before the Kentucky scuffle. Am I to be accountable for the future?

    C) What is stunning about my article is that actual members of congress are committing these acts, not some random, supporter off the street. Last time I checked, anyone can where a Rand Paul T-Shirt. See "A" and actually read the article.

    D) At least my article does not make an excuse for one party's violence in light of another party's violence. That's called hypocricy, which is what you comment is. I think any political violence on either side of the isle is dispicable. It's not my fault that it is Democrat candidates in particular who are representing the violence from the left.


Commenting here is a privilege, not a right. Comments that contain cursing or insults and those failing to add to the discussion will be summarily deleted.