by the Left Coast Rebel
h/t to friend of the site Zoltarsees for the Polanski video.Visit his Youtube Channel here.
What is worse? The fact that Roman Polanski, the admitted child molester/rapist has so much support in Hollywood or the fact that he is out on bail, under house arrest; but living in luxury and comfort? Leave it to the Euro-lib court system to even let this guy post bail. The Chicago Tribune has the story:
Luxo-prison: House arrest doesn't sound all that bad, especially if it means lying low in a luxurious chalet in a Swiss village. Film director Roman Polanski, 76, was released from custody yesterday after posting $4.5 million bail and transferred to the village of Gstaad, where he is under house arrest at his chalet, the Swiss government said in a statement. Though he's stuck at home with an electronic monitoring device, the film icon is allowed unlimited phone calls, e-mailing and
Internet, and he has permission to carry on with his social life.
2 comments:
You are so right about this man. Like the thief Madoff he gets to live it up in luxury but his time will come. By the way I love your site name. Keep informing the uninformed.
Polanski's in Gstaad, is he? Reminds me of a story.
William F. Buckley, Jr. and his wife Pat often rented a house - actually, an old monastery, the Chateau de Rougemont - in Switzerland, not far from Gstaad. On one occasion in the mid-1970's, the Buckleys' friend, Prof. John Kenneth Galbraith, arrived for a visit, accompanied by none other than Sen. Ted Kennedy. Not long after arriving, Kennedy asked if he could borrow a car to drive into Gstaad. Mrs. Buckley replied, "Certainly not - there are three bridges between here and Gstaad."
Heh heh heh! Forgive me if you've heard it before, but it's a classic.
Post a Comment
Comments that contain cursing, threats, David Plouffe trolls, circular reasoning, incendiary language, or general leftist hate and moonbattery may be deleted by the Left Coast Rebel....