Climategate/CRU Email Hack/Global Warming Hoaxe Update

by the Left Coast Rebel

First, a headline this morning from the Times of London --- Climate Change Data Dumped:

SCIENTISTS at the University of East Anglia (UEA) have admitted throwing away much of the raw temperature data on which their predictions of global warming are based. It means that other academics are not able to check basic calculations said to show a long-term rise in temperature over the past 150 years.

The UEA’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) was forced to reveal the loss following requests for the data under Freedom of Information legislation. The data were gathered from weather stations around the world and then adjusted to take account of variables in the way they were collected. The revised figures were kept, but the originals — stored on paper and magnetic tape — were dumped to save space when the CRU moved to a new building.



Now rememeber, for those not familiar with the standing of the CRU, just what it is and what it does:
The CRU is the world’s leading centre for reconstructing past climate and
temperatures. Climate change sceptics have long been keen to examine exactly how
its data were compiled. That is now impossible.

Another British source has a great piece from yesterday too, Christopher Booker in the Telegraph:

There are three threads in particular in the leaked documents which have sent a shock wave through informed observers across the world. Perhaps the most obvious, as lucidly put together by Willis Eschenbach (see McIntyre's blog Climate Audit and Anthony Watt's blog Watts Up With That), is the highly disturbing series of emails which show how Dr Jones and his colleagues have for years been discussing the devious tactics whereby they could avoid releasing their data to outsiders under freedom of information laws.

Read the rest here
Via Memeorandum
Also read The Other McCain

5 comments:

  1. Have you seen this? http://www.eastangliaemails.com/
    ReplyDelete
  2. So is the CRU run by ACORN too?
    ReplyDelete
  3. @ RG - Now that is a link, thankyou!

    @ Chris W - Perhaps separated at birth, lol.
    ReplyDelete
  4. Their trashing the raw data is particularly damning to their cause.

    Your average liberal layman has no idea what "peer review" means. What it means is that you provide not only your finished study, but all of the raw data/materials as well so other scientists can independently analyze the data to see if they reach the same conclusion.

    That was not happening with this junk science crowd. "Peer review" meant merely rubber stamping each others work while damning the heretics to hell.
    ReplyDelete

Commenting here is a privilege, not a right. Comments that contain cursing or insults and those failing to add to the discussion will be summarily deleted.