7.17.2009

An Intervention for Obama's Debting

Guest post by New Conservative Generation


It’s time to hold an intervention for Obama. We need to get him into Debtors Anonymous as quick as possible. With the economy on the ropes and hopes of economic recovery bleak, Obama has decided it’s time to spend more money, a lot more money. Obama’s health care will cost $1 trillion dollars. I’ve long been warning that our options available for stabilizing the economy have been dwindling over the last few months and new developments have been buried under the news of the Sotomayor confirmation hearings. Obama’s health care initiative was always a bad idea, but given recent economic news, moving forward with the legislation has never been more foolish.

An example of the program Obama should follow thanks to SNL.


Let me begin by summarizing the White House’s and Fed’s strategy for stabilizing the economy. The Fed has slashed interest rates to zero to lower the cost of borrowing and boost capital expenditures. At the same time the White House has been spending and sending trillions of dollars to political cronies in boxes with blue ribbons. To fund Obama, the Fed has the money printers working overtime. In short, the policy is to expand the money supply as large and fast as possible. The effects of which create inflation. Generally, no one worries about inflation during a recession because prices are usually deflating.

Great, the boring part of the post is out of the way.

So the economic wisdom in Washington has been, we can keep the economy limping along so long as we keep spending. Sounds like a party when you’ve got your hands on America’s credit card. No one seemed to ask, “What happens if things get worse?” You can’t cut interest rates when they are zero (Hat tip to Nick). Two months ago, Paul Krugman would have responded, “Well, we may not be able to cut interest rates, but since there is no such thing as inflation, we can just keep spending more.” Last month, we saw the largest increase to the CPI in a year, a jump of .06 percentage points to .08. Normally, this wouldn't be cause for alarm except, inflation is not supposed to occur when the economy is still retracting. The FOMC came out this month and is predicting that it will continue to retract throughout the rest of the year.

Let me sum this up for you. We can’t cut interest rates anymore, because they are at zero. We can’t continue to deficit spend, because our economy is so sensitve to inflation, that inflation is increasing when it shouldn't be. Inflation would have a terrible impact on people in the middle of an economic recession and a time where 16.5 percent of people are unemployed or underemployed. How are we going to keep pushing those great Obama policies without tacking onto the deficit?

Congressman Rangel gave us the answer earlier this week. We are going to raise taxes and we are going to raise them so high we are going to beat out Clinton. Everyone in the left, please take a sigh of relief. It looks like we may have Pay-Go. It looks as though Obama is not going to blindly spend our country into an inflation avalanche that buries us all (he already has). Oh, I forgot to mention that dramatically raising taxes causes higher unemployment (see my post on tax incidence). What was that figure I said again? Yes, 16.5 percent unemployed and underemployed. The best part is that raising taxes has a negating effect on stimulus when your strategy is deficit spending, which happens to be Obama's plan. So Obama’s first major bill was to stimulate the economy and his second major bill will be to cancel his first bill out.

It’s not too late to stop the madness. Please support the Obama spending intervention and tell your representatives to oppose all Obama spending sprees for the rest of his Presidency. Remember, when the addict is the President, they don’t hurt themselves, they hurt everyone else around them.

8 comments:

Teresa said...

President Obama and the Democrats plan of increased spending and raising taxes is going to cause the U.S. to go bankrupt. But, is that Obama's plan? Could he be trying to create a New World Order? It would give Obama a huge amount of power. Obama is the most power hungry person I have ever seen!! Yes, count me in for the Obama intervention. He really needs an intervention from above-God. If that happened it would help all citizens in this country.

Just a conservative girl said...

The one thing that many people don't seem to understand is that our poor, is still rich compared to the the world's poor. The poverty we have in this country is nothing to what goes on in countries across Africa and Asia. So, when they say the rich what exactly do they mean. Just our country's rich, or the the world's rich? If it is the latter, people will be in for a big surprise.

conservative generation said...

@ Teresa - For all the Obama policies that seem to be thought out by either an evil genius or niave sheeple, I think Obama is a niave sheeple when it comes to the economy. I believe that Obama is an intelligent man, maybe even brilliant, but I've been watching him since the campaign and I have yet to see even the slightest sign he has even a basic understanding of the economy.

He was a lawyer and a community organizer who never ran anything. It's always been left to someone else. I believe that Obama does whatever his advisors tell him to do and his advisors are a bunch of egg heads who are busy inserting the amount of government spending for X into an economic, mathematical model that they created showing economic growth. All the while they were missing all the economic nuances that were saying, "deficit spending in this situation at this time in history is a bad idea."

@ Conservative Girl - I agree. When I was an undergraduate student I wrote a paper on the economic development of developing nations. Despite what the left says, the US has one of the most even economic distribution of wealth in the world in comparison to others. The funny part is that the distribution of wealth in a nation is tied both to freedom and capitalism. Nations that are communist, fascist, or dictatorships have the worst. China comes to mind.

Ananda girl said...

Loved the video... how true! And I have to say I love the Harold Lloyd photo too.

There is nothing here that I disagree with at all.
Good post, sir.

Ramblings From a Young American said...

"You can’t cut interest rates when they are zero."

Don't say that line too many times are the Democrats are going to start following Sweden. Like a child you tell over and over again "don't put your hand in the blender to see if it works!" One should not tell Democrats that the Fed can't go below 0% because while it "technically" (notice the quotes) can't go below zero percent Sweden has somehow managed to pull it off.

Talk about a total absence of capital accumulation!

http://www.creditwritedowns.com/2009/07/sweden-negative-interest-rates-and-quantitative-easing.html

That said, I love this post! And the Fed printing money, I've been seeing a few liberals try to find a better phrase, is now being called "quantitative easing." A much more clinical, 'scientific' term that implies happy "easing" of the "economic condition." Non-theatrically, it amounts to the same thing and I am so glad to see someone tell us that 'A' is 'A' and to hell with political correctness. Enough with MSNBC and MSM!

DD2 aka Debonair Dude said...

Great guest post, I really enjoyed reading it.

christian soldier said...

Great video and commentary...
C-CS

Left Coast Rebel said...

@ Ananda - Thanks for reading, Cgen is a great asset to the blogosphere and as a guest here as well.

@ Young American - Great points!

@ DD2 - Thanks, head on over to New Conservative Generation, it's a great blog. Cgen has a knack for economics and finance that I can't match!

@ Christian Sold - Thanks for reading!

Post a Comment

Comments that contain cursing, threats, David Plouffe trolls, circular reasoning, incendiary language, or general ass-hats may be deleted by the Left Coast Rebel....

Related Posts with Thumbnails